Source assessmentSupporting
Gender Bias and Conversational Agents: an ethical perspective on Social Robotics
Gender bias in conversational agentsAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 4/6 (actionability 0 + authority 2 + currency 2)
Total4/6
Actionability0/2
Authority2/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
0/2No rationale recorded.
Finally, we suggest which approach in our opinion might have the best chances to reduce the negative effects of biases and discriminatory visions of gender dynamics.
Authority
2/2No rationale recorded.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH/SCHOLARSHIP Science and Engineering Ethics (2022) 28:23 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-022-00376-3
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicGender bias in conversational agents
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage1 Plan & design
Layermodel
GranularityNot recorded