Source assessmentSupporting
Gender and Age Stereotypes in Robotics for Eldercare: Ethical Implications of Stakeholder Perspectives from Technology Development, Industry, and Nursing
Gender and age stereotypes in eldercare roboticsAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 4/6 (actionability 0 + authority 2 + currency 2)
Total4/6
Actionability0/2
Authority2/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
0/2No rationale recorded.
Authority
2/2No rationale recorded.
Science and Engineering Ethics (2022) 28:34 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-022-00394-1 1 3 ORIGINAL RESEARCH/SCHOLARSHIP Gender and Age Stereotypes in Robotics for Eldercare
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicGender and age stereotypes in eldercare robotics
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage1 Plan & design
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded