Back to assessments
Source assessmentSupporting

Exploring the Ethics of Interaction with Care Robots

Ethics of care robotsAcademicdocument

Assessment outcome

total 3/4 (actionability 1 + authority 2); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 4.5/6

Total3/6
Actionability1/2
Authority2/2
Currency—

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

The chapter clearly lists multiple named academic authors.

Issuer authority (evidence)

Score 2. Level 2: published as a peer-reviewed academic book chapter by Springer.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

HTTP 200, 1958 words of full text extracted

G2 · AI nexuspass

The source is explicitly about care robots and anthropomorphic AI.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

Addresses ethics, risks, and philosophical frameworks regarding care robots.

G4 · Attributablepass

The chapter clearly lists multiple named academic authors.

G5 · In forcepass

No indication of retraction or supersession is present on the page.

Scored criteria

Actionability

1/2

Score 1. Level 1: provides principles and direction without specifying binding steps.

we will provide a philosophical-ethical analysis that offers a solid framework for the debate surrounding the potential risks and benefits of implementing assistive robots in people’s daily lives

Authority

2/2

Score 2. Level 2: published as a peer-reviewed academic book chapter by Springer.

Exploring the Ethics of Interaction with Care Robots. In: Lara, F., Deckers, J. (eds) Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology, vol 41. Springer, Cham.

Currency

—

computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)

Classification

Coverage topicEthics of care robots
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
Granularitydocument