Back to assessments
Source assessmentContext only

Ethics in Human-Robot Interaction

ethics in human-robot interactionAcademicdocument

Assessment outcome

total 1/4 (actionability 0 + authority 1); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 1.5/6

Total1/6
Actionability0/2
Authority1/2
Currency—

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

Named author and institution are clearly identified.

Issuer authority (evidence)

Score 1: Reputable academic institution acting officially through published book chapter by University of Lisbon author.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

HTTP 200, 1336 words of full text extracted

G2 · AI nexuspass

Robotics and human-robot interaction are the primary focus of the chapter.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

The chapter discusses ethical questions and legislative efforts regarding robotics.

G4 · Attributablepass

Named author and institution are clearly identified.

G5 · In forcepass

There is no evidence on the page indicating that this published book chapter has been superseded or retracted.

Scored criteria

Actionability

0/2

Score 0: Description or analysis only, providing no binding steps, specific obligations, or directional principles.

Authority

1/2

Score 1: Reputable academic institution acting officially through published book chapter by University of Lisbon author.

Sequeira, J.S. (2019). Ethics in Human-Robot Interaction. In: Ayanoğlu, H., Duarte, E. (eds) Emotional Design in Human-Robot Interaction.

Currency

—

computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)

Classification

Coverage topicethics in human-robot interaction
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
Granularitydocument