Source assessmentSupporting
Ethics for social robotics: A critical analysis
Ethics for social roboticsAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 4/6 (actionability 1 + authority 1 + currency 2)
Total4/6
Actionability1/2
Authority1/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
To achieve such a broader and deeper normative thinking on the ethical implications of social robotics for (institutional) care practices, we outline two main research lines to be next developed
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
Ethics for social robotics: A critical analysis Júlia Pareto Boada† Institut de Robòtica i Informàtica Industrial, CSIC-UPC Facultat de Filosofia, Universitat de Barcelona (UB)
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicEthics for social robotics
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage1 Plan & design
Layerhuman
GranularityNot recorded