Back to assessments
Source assessmentContext only

Ethics and Security Automata: Policy and Technical Challenges of the Robotic Use of Force

Robotic use of force ethicsAcademic

Assessment outcome

total 1/4 (actionability 0 + authority 1); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 1.5/6

Total1/6
Actionability0/2
Authority1/2
Currency—

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuer authority (evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

Passed in screening.

G2 · AI nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G4 · Attributablepass

Passed in screening.

G5 · In forcepass

Passed in screening.

Scored criteria

Actionability

0/2

No rationale recorded.

By examining how machines can pass ‘reasonable person’ tests to demonstrate measurable levels of moral competence and display the ability to determine the ‘spirit’ as well as the ‘letter of the law’, the author builds upon existing research to define conditions under which robotic force can and ought to be used to enhance human security.

Authority

1/2

No rationale recorded.

Publisher ‎ Routledge Publication date ‎ November 9, 2017

Currency

—

No rationale recorded.

Classification

Coverage topicRobotic use of force ethics
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage7 Use & impact
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded
Ethics and Security Automata: Policy and Technical Challenges of the Robotic Use of Force · CEI AI Governance Database