Source assessmentSupporting
Ethical values and social care robots for older people: an international qualitative study
Ethical values in social care robotsAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 3/6 (actionability 1 + authority 1 + currency 1)
Total3/6
Actionability1/2
Authority1/2
Currency1/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
Values such as respect for autonomy, safety, enablement, independence, privacy and social connectedness should be reflected in the design of social robots.
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
Original citation: Draper, Heather and Sorell, Tom. (2017) Ethical values and social care robots for older people: an international qualitative study. Ethics and Information Technology, 19 (1). pp. 49-68.
Currency
1/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicEthical values in social care robots
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage1 Plan & design
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded