Back to assessments
Source assessmentSupporting

Ethical, Legal, and Societal Dimensions of AI-Driven Social Robots in Elderly Healthcare

AI social robots in elderly healthcareAcademicdocument

Assessment outcome

total 2/4 (actionability 1 + authority 1); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 3.0/6

Total2/6
Actionability1/2
Authority1/2
Currency—

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

Authored by Alina Vozna and Stefania Costantini.

Issuer authority (evidence)

Level 1 (capped): the quote establishes a journal venue but does not establish the peer-review status required for Level 2.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

HTTP 200, 8798 words of full text extracted

G2 · AI nexuspass

The source is entirely about AI-driven social robots in healthcare.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

Addresses regulations, ethical standards, and governance of AI systems.

G4 · Attributablepass

Authored by Alina Vozna and Stefania Costantini.

G5 · In forcepass

No indication of being superseded or repealed.

Scored criteria

Actionability

1/2

Level 1: The quote provides principles and direction on governance, lacking specific binding execution steps.

Strong legal frameworks and moral standards must direct the use of AI-driven social robots in eldercare in order to guarantee responsible use.

Authority

1/2

Level 1 (capped): the quote establishes a journal venue but does not establish the peer-review status required for Level 2.

Research Article Intelligenza Arti ficiale 1–11 © The Author(s) 2025

Currency

—

computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)

Classification

Coverage topicAI social robots in elderly healthcare
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage7 Use & impact
Layerboth
Granularitydocument