Source assessmentSupporting

Ethical implications of AI in robotic surgical training: A Delphi consensus statement

AI in robotic surgical trainingAcademic

Assessment outcome

total 3/4 (authority 1 + currency 2); actionability unscored, so pro-rated to 4.5/6

Total3/6

Actionability—

Authority1/2

Currency2/2

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuer authority (evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

Passed in screening.

G2 · AI nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G4 · Attributablepass

Passed in screening.

G5 · In forcepass

Passed in screening.

Scored criteria

Actionability

—

No rationale recorded.

Authority

1/2

No rationale recorded.

Article: Collins, JW, Marcus, HJ, Ghazi, A et al. (2022) Ethical implications of AI in robotic surgical training: A Delphi consensus statement. European Urology Focus, 8 (2). pp. 613-622.

Currency

2/2

No rationale recorded.

Classification

Coverage topicAI in robotic surgical training

PerspectiveAcademic

Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting

Layerboth

GranularityNot recorded