Ethical implications in using robots among older adults living with dementia
Assessment outcome
total 1/4 (actionability 0 + authority 1); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 1.5/6
Authorship & scope
The article explicitly names the author and her institutional affiliation.
Level 1 (capped): the quote establishes a journal venue but does not establish the peer-review status required for Level 2.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
HTTP 200, 13520 words of full text extracted
The source explicitly focuses on the use of social and companion robots and AI tools in dementia care.
It discusses governance dimensions including consent, transparency, trust, accountability, autonomy, and ethical implications.
The article explicitly names the author and her institutional affiliation.
There is no retraction or supersession notice on the page; it is presented as a current published article.
Scored criteria
Actionability
0/2Anchor 0. Description and analysis only, reviewing ethical implications of robots for dementia without naming binding obligations.
Authority
1/2Level 1 (capped): the quote establishes a journal venue but does not establish the peer-review status required for Level 2.
1463 frontpsychiat Frontiers in Psychiatry Front Psychiatry Frontiers Media SA PMC11465238
Currency
—computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)