Ethical governance of AI-based humanoid carebots: the case for Ethics of Techno-care
Assessment outcome
total 2/4 (actionability 1 + authority 1); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 3.0/6
Authorship & scope
The text explicitly names the author, Tamir Sivan, and their institutional affiliation.
Score 1: Published by a reputable academic research center acting officially.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
HTTP 200, 10567 words of full text extracted
The source is entirely about AI-based humanoid carebots and their ethical implementation.
The paper directly addresses ethical governance, autonomy, transparency, and normative guidance for carebots.
The text explicitly names the author, Tamir Sivan, and their institutional affiliation.
There is no evidence on the page indicating that this article has been superseded, retracted, or withdrawn.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2Score 1: Provides principles and direction for a new normative framework without establishing binding implementation steps or specific obligations.
We first distinguish EoC care setting and care-relationships from those of EtC, then offer a preliminary outline for this new normative guidance, comprised of the following key elements: human care-sensitive design, minimally-necessary deception, techno-care transparency, techno-care privacy design, techno-care autonomy, techno-care responsibility and accountability, and diversity and cultural sensitivity in AIhC design.
Authority
1/2Score 1: Published by a reputable academic research center acting officially.
The Center for Health Law and Ethics , University of Haifa , 199 Abba Khoushy Ave, 3498838 Haifa, Israel
Currency
—computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)