Source assessmentSupporting
Artificial Intelligence and Civil Liability
robot evolution ethics liabilityAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 2/4 (actionability 1 + authority 1); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 3.0/6
Total2/6
Actionability1/2
Authority1/2
Currency—
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
The article indicates a method of comprehensively solving the problem of gaps in liability for artificial intelligence, proposed in the literature, based on the idea of designing social engineering systems that enable “meaningful human control”
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
ORIGINAL PAPER Ethical dilemmas related to the robot evolution Małgorzata Maternowska 1 More details Hide details 1 Akademia Górniczo-Hutnicza w Krakowie
Currency
—No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicrobot evolution ethics liability
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded