Source assessmentSupporting
Ethical Design in Medical AI Robotics: Between Innovation and Responsibility
ethical design in medical AI roboticsAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 4/6 (actionability 2 + authority 0 + currency 2)
Total4/6
Actionability2/2
Authority0/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
2/2No rationale recorded.
Thus, at the goal - setting level, the obligation to include a “surgeon -in-the-loop”, who has the final decision -making authority over any autonomous action and can immediately stop the robotic operation in the eve nt of any deviation from the protocol, will always be added.
Authority
0/2No rationale recorded.
Nechita R.-M., Nechita M.-I. Robotica Management, 30-2 / 2025 27 ETHICAL DESIGN IN MEDICAL AI ROBOTICS: BETWEEN INNOVATION AND RESPONSIBILITY
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicethical design in medical AI robotics
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage1 Plan & design
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded