Source assessmentSupporting
Ethical Design and Standardization for Robot Governance
robot governance and ethical designAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 2/4 (actionability 1 + authority 1); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 3.0/6
Total2/6
Actionability1/2
Authority1/2
Currency—
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
In addition to considering the regulation of critical AI technologies, the chapter also argues for a regulatory framework that relies on nonbinding and flexible AI ethics standards
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 December 2024 By Yueh-Hsuan Weng Edited by Woodrow Barfield
Currency
—No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicrobot governance and ethical design
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage1 Plan & design
Layermodel
GranularityNot recorded