Source assessmentSupporting
Ethical Considerations Toward Harmonizing Human and Machine Agency in Embodied Neurotechnologies
Neurotechnology and human-machine agencyAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 4/6 (actionability 1 + authority 1 + currency 2)
Total4/6
Actionability1/2
Authority1/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
embodied neurotechnologies ought to place priority on supporting their users’ subjective sense of agency, even above optimizing performance or functional agency
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
Vol.: (0123456789) Neuroethics (2026) 19:30 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-026-09657-1 RESEARCH Ethical Considerations Toward Harmonizing Human and Machine Agency in Embodied Neurotechnologies Nicolas Berberich · Gordon Cheng · James Giordano
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicNeurotechnology and human-machine agency
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage1 Plan & design
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded