Back to assessments
Source assessmentContext only

Embodied Care, Spatiality, and the Ethics of Robotic Surgery

Ethics and use of robotic surgeryAcademic

Assessment outcome

total 1/4 (actionability 0 + authority 1); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 1.5/6

Total1/6
Actionability0/2
Authority1/2
Currency—

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuer authority (evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

Passed in screening.

G2 · AI nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G4 · Attributablepass

Passed in screening.

G5 · In forcepass

Passed in screening.

Scored criteria

Actionability

0/2

No rationale recorded.

Authority

1/2

No rationale recorded.

A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Drexel University by William Andrew Drust in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Science, Technology, and Society

Currency

—

No rationale recorded.

Classification

Coverage topicEthics and use of robotic surgery
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage7 Use & impact
Layerhuman
GranularityNot recorded