Back to assessments
Source assessmentContext only

“Embodied AI” and the Direct Participation in Hostilities: A Legal Analysis

Embodied AI and direct participation in hostilitiesAcademic

Assessment outcome

total 2/6 (actionability 0 + authority 1 + currency 1)

Total2/6
Actionability0/2
Authority1/2
Currency1/2

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuer authority (evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

Passed in screening.

G2 · AI nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G4 · Attributablepass

Passed in screening.

G5 · In forcepass

Passed in screening.

Scored criteria

Actionability

0/2

No rationale recorded.

Authority

1/2

No rationale recorded.

Francis Grimal is a Reader in Public International Law, University of Buckingham, UK, and Michael J. Pollard is a PhD Candidate in Public International Law, University of Buckingham, UK.

Currency

1/2

No rationale recorded.

Classification

Coverage topicEmbodied AI and direct participation in hostilities
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layermodel
GranularityNot recorded