Source assessmentContext only
Dissecting liabilities in adversarial surgical robot failures: A national (Danish) and EU law perspective
surgical robot liabilities and cyber attacksAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 2/6 (actionability 0 + authority 0 + currency 2)
Total2/6
Actionability0/2
Authority0/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
0/2No rationale recorded.
For us to legally discuss surgical robots, we must categorise them and the features of which they consist of. We choose to consider them as cyberphysical systems
Authority
0/2No rationale recorded.
1Department of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Strathclyde, kaspar.rosager-ludvigsen@strath.ac.uk 2Department of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Strathclyde, shishir.nagaraja@strath.ac.uk January 2022
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicsurgical robot liabilities and cyber attacks
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded