Source assessmentSupporting
Development of Artificial Intelligence Service Robot According to the Korean Ethical Self-Checklist
AI service robot ethical self-checklistAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 4/6 (actionability 1 + authority 1 + currency 2)
Total4/6
Actionability1/2
Authority1/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
presents the checklist as a voluntary code of ethics that can respond flexibly.
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
ICRES 2022: 7th International Conference on Robot Ethics and Standards, Seoul, South Korea, 18-19 July 2022
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicAI service robot ethical self-checklist
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage1 Plan & design
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded