CEIAI Governance Database
Back to assessments
Source assessmentSupporting

Design of Robotic Care: Ethical Implications of a Multi-Actor Perspective

Ethical implications of robotic careAcademic

Assessment outcome

total 2/4 (actionability 0 + authority 2); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 3.0/6

Total2/6
Actionability0/2
Authority2/2
Currency—

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuer authority (evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

Passed in screening.

G2 · AI nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G4 · Attributablepass

Passed in screening.

G5 · In forcepass

Passed in screening.

Scored criteria

Actionability

0/2

No rationale recorded.

Authority

2/2

No rationale recorded.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › Scientific › peer-review

Currency

—

No rationale recorded.

Classification

Coverage topicEthical implications of robotic care
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage7 Use & impact
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded