Source assessmentContext only
Debunking Robot Rights Metaphysically, Ethically, and Legally
Debunking robot rightsAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 2/6 (actionability 0 + authority 0 + currency 2)
Total2/6
Actionability0/2
Authority0/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
0/2No rationale recorded.
Authority
0/2No rationale recorded.
Abeba Birhane, Mozilla Foundation & School of Computer Science and Statistics, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland birhanea@tcd.ie Jelle van Dijk Faculty of Engineering Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands jelle.vandijk@utwente.nl Frank Pasquale Cornell Tech and Cornell Law School New York, USA, frank.pasquale@gmail.com
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicDebunking robot rights
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded