Source assessmentSupporting
Data protection for networked and robotic toys – a legal perspective
Data protection for networked toysAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 4/6 (actionability 2 + authority 1 + currency 1)
Total4/6
Actionability2/2
Authority1/2
Currency1/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
2/2No rationale recorded.
On the other hand, data controllers are asked, pursuant to Article 8.2 of the GDPR, to make ‘reasonable efforts’ in order to assess and verify that consent has been given or authorized by the holder of parental responsibility over the child
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
IRIE International Review of Information Ethics Vol. 27 (12/2018) © by IRIE – all rights reserved www.i-r-i-e.net 31 ISSN 1614-1687 Rocco Panetta, Federico Sartore: Data protection for networked and robotic toys – a legal perspective
Currency
1/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicData protection for networked toys
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded