Source assessmentSupporting
Danaher’s Ethical Behaviourism: An Adequate Guide to Assessing the Moral Status of a Robot?
Robot moral status and ethical behaviourismAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 3/6 (actionability 0 + authority 1 + currency 2)
Total3/6
Actionability0/2
Authority1/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
0/2No rationale recorded.
This paper critically assesses John Danaher’s ‘ethical behaviourism’, a theory on how the moral status of robots should be determined.
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
Published in: Science and Engineering Ethics Publication status and date: Published: 01/01/2020 DOI (link to publisher): 10.1007/s11948-020-00230-4 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for the published version (APA): Smids, J. (2020). Danaher’s Ethical Behaviourism: An Adequate Guide to Assessing the Moral Status of a Robot? Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(5), 2849-2866.
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicRobot moral status and ethical behaviourism
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage7 Use & impact
Layermodel
GranularityNot recorded