Source assessmentSupporting
Opinion: Uses of Copyrighted Materials for Machine Learning
Copyright and machine learning datasetsRegulatory/legal
Assessment outcome
total 3/6 (actionability 0 + authority 2 + currency 1)
Total3/6
Actionability0/2
Authority2/2
Currency1/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
0/2No rationale recorded.
Authority
2/2No rationale recorded.
State of Israel Ministry of Justice 1 Legislation and Legal Counsel (Civil Law) Jerusalem: 25 Kislev 5783 December 18, 2022 OPINION: USES OF COPYRIGHTED MATERIALS FOR MACHINE LEARNING
Currency
1/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicCopyright and machine learning datasets
PerspectiveRegulatory/legal
Lifecycle stage3 Build & train model
Layermodel
GranularityNot recorded