Source assessmentContext only
Comparing Robot and Human guided Personalization: Adaptive Exercise Robots are Perceived as more Competent and Trustworthy
Robot and Human guided PersonalizationAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 2/6 (actionability 0 + authority 1 + currency 1)
Total2/6
Actionability0/2
Authority1/2
Currency1/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
0/2No rationale recorded.
International Journal of Social Robotics (2021) 13:169–185 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00629-w Comparing Robot and Human guided Personalization: Adaptive Exercise Robots are Perceived as more Competent and Trustworthy Sebastian Schneider 1,2 · Franz Kummert 1 Accepted: 22 January 2020 / Published online: 8 February 2020 © The Author(s) 2020 Abstract Learning and matching a user’s preference is an essential aspect of achieving a productive collaboration in long-term Human– Robot Interaction (HRI).
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
International Journal of Social Robotics (2021) 13:169–185 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00629-w Comparing Robot and Human guided Personalization: Adaptive Exercise Robots are Perceived as more Competent and Trustworthy Sebastian Schneider 1,2 · Franz Kummert 1 Accepted: 22 January 2020 / Published online: 8 February 2020 © The Author(s) 2020
Currency
1/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicRobot and Human guided Personalization
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage7 Use & impact
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded