Source assessmentContext only
Cognitive Incompatibilities Between Law and Robotic Legal-Decision Making
robotics in legal decision-makingAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 1/4 (actionability 0 + authority 1); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 1.5/6
Total1/6
Actionability0/2
Authority1/2
Currency—
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
0/2No rationale recorded.
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
Series Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications Ebook Volume 311: Envisioning Robots in Society – Power, Politics, and Public Space
Currency
—No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicrobotics in legal decision-making
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage7 Use & impact
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded