Source assessmentSupporting
Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-generated Content
Transparency of AI-generated contentRegulatory/legal
Assessment outcome
total 3/4 (actionability 2 + authority 1); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 4.5/6
Total3/6
Actionability2/2
Authority1/2
Currency—
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
2/2No rationale recorded.
Outputs of AI systems (audio, image, video, text) are marked in a machine-readable format and detectable as artificially generated or manipulated.
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
The Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-generated Content was drawn up by independent experts in a multi-stakeholder process facilitated by the AI Office.
Currency
—No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicTransparency of AI-generated content
PerspectiveRegulatory/legal
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded