Back to assessments
Source assessmentSupporting

Challenging the Neo-Anthropocentric Relational Approach to Robot Rights

Robot rights and anthropocentrismAcademictopic page

Assessment outcome

total 3/6 (actionability 0 + authority 1 + currency 2)

Total3/6
Actionability0/2
Authority1/2
Currency2/2

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

The text explicitly names Henrik Skaug Sætra as the author.

Issuer authority (evidence)

Level 1 (capped): the quote establishes a journal venue but does not establish the peer-review status required for Level 2.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

HTTP 200, 9064 words of full text extracted

G2 · AI nexuspass

The paper focuses extensively on the ethics and moral standing of robots and artificial intelligence.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

The source evaluates ethical and normative governance issues concerning moral standing and rights for robots.

G4 · Attributablepass

The text explicitly names Henrik Skaug Sætra as the author.

G5 · In forcepass

No evidence on the page indicates that this academic article has been retracted, superseded, or withdrawn.

Scored criteria

Actionability

0/2

Level 0: Academic article providing analysis and description of robot rights and anthropocentrism, without prescribing binding steps or obligations.

Authority

1/2

Level 1 (capped): the quote establishes a journal venue but does not establish the peer-review status required for Level 2.

This article was submitted to Ethics in Robotics and Artificial Intelligence, a section of the journal Frontiers in Robotics and AI

Currency

2/2

computed: newest date 2026-10-22 (via http-header), ~0.0y old; within the 60-month academic_research window for perspective 'Academic' → 2

Classification

Coverage topicRobot rights and anthropocentrism
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage7 Use & impact
Layermodel
Granularitytopic page