Source assessmentSupporting
Challenges and Solutions to Criminal Liability for the Actions of Robots and AI
Criminal liability for robot actionsAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 2/4 (authority 0 + currency 2); actionability unscored, so pro-rated to 3.0/6
Total2/6
Actionability—
Authority0/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
—No rationale recorded.
Authority
0/2No rationale recorded.
Advances in Technology Innovation, vol. 9, no. 1, 2024, pp. 65-84 English language proofreader: Chih-Wei Chang Challenges and Solutions to Criminal Liability for the Actions of Robots and AI Vladimír Smejkal 1,*, Jindřich Kodl 2 1Department of Informatics, Faculty of Business and Management, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicCriminal liability for robot actions
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded