Source assessmentSupporting
Can robots be trustworthy? Reflections about responsive robots and trust as a human capability
Trust and social robots in careAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 3/6 (actionability 0 + authority 1 + currency 2)
Total3/6
Actionability0/2
Authority1/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
0/2No rationale recorded.
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
ORIGINAL ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1007/s00481-023-00760-y Ethik in der Medizin (2023) 35:221–246 Can robots be trustworthy? Reflections about responsive robots and trust as a human capability
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicTrust and social robots in care
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded