Can a Robot Provide the Answer? Ethical Considerations in Using Social Robots for Assessment and Monitoring in Healthcare
Assessment outcome
total 3/4 (actionability 1 + authority 2); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 4.5/6
Authorship & scope
The text clearly identifies Heike Felzmann as the author of the chapter.
Level 2: Published as a peer-reviewed book chapter by Springer from an academic author at NUI Galway.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
HTTP 200, 2199 words of full text extracted
The source is explicitly about social robots used for healthcare assessment and monitoring.
The source addresses ethical challenges, values, privacy, and value-sensitive design regarding social robots.
The text clearly identifies Heike Felzmann as the author of the chapter.
There is no indication on the page that this version has been superseded or withdrawn.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2Score 1: Provides general principles and directional recommendations (value-sensitive design, tailored training) without setting binding, actionable obligations.
It will be argued that in order to address the ethical concerns effectively, value-sensitive design and deployment planning as well as tailored training of professionals to use those robots are essential requirements.
Authority
2/2Level 2: Published as a peer-reviewed book chapter by Springer from an academic author at NUI Galway.
School of History and Philosophy, NUI Galway, Galway, Ireland Heike Felzmann
Currency
—computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)