Back to assessments
Source assessmentCore

Senate Bill No. 524

Law enforcement artificial intelligence reportingRegulatory/legaltopic page

Assessment outcome

total 4/4 (actionability 2 + authority 2); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 6.0/6

Total4/6
Actionability2/2
Authority2/2
Currency—

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

Authored by legislator Arreguín and enacted by the State of California.

Issuer authority (evidence)

Level 2: Binding law enacted by the state legislature.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

HTTP 200, 1165 words of full text extracted

G2 · AI nexuspass

The bill regulates the use of artificial intelligence in law enforcement reports.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

Establishes mandatory policies, disclosure requirements, audit trails, and vendor restrictions for AI use.

G4 · Attributablepass

Authored by legislator Arreguín and enacted by the State of California.

G5 · In forcepass

Enacted chapter text indicating approval by the Governor with no text showing supersession or repeal.

Scored criteria

Actionability

2/2

Level 2: Names a specific obligation and duty that law enforcement agencies must follow regarding AI-generated reports.

Each law enforcement agency shall maintain a policy to require an official report prepared by a law enforcement officer or any member of a law enforcement agency that is generated using artificial intelligence either fully or partially to contain both of the following

Authority

2/2

Level 2: Binding law enacted by the state legislature.

Senate Bill No. 524 CHAPTER 587 An act to add Section 13663 to the Penal Code, relating to law enforcement agencies.

Currency

—

computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)

Classification

Coverage topicLaw enforcement artificial intelligence reporting
PerspectiveRegulatory/legal
Lifecycle stage7 Use & impact
Layerboth
Granularitytopic page
Senate Bill No. 524 · CEI AI Governance Database