Back to assessments
Source assessmentCore

Senate Bill No. 942

AI transparency and provenanceRegulatory/legaltopic page

Assessment outcome

total 4/4 (actionability 2 + authority 2); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 6.0/6

Total4/6
Actionability2/2
Authority2/2
Currency—

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

Issued by the California Legislature.

Issuer authority (evidence)

Level 2: Binding law enacted by the state legislature.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

HTTP 200, 1871 words of full text extracted

G2 · AI nexuspass

The text exclusively focuses on regulating generative artificial intelligence systems and transparency requirements.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

The bill establishes legal rules, compliance mandates, and penalties for AI providers.

G4 · Attributablepass

Issued by the California Legislature.

G5 · In forcepass

The bill text is enacted law with a future operative date and no repeal notice.

Scored criteria

Actionability

2/2

Level 2: Names a specific obligation to make an AI detection tool available.

This bill, the California AI Transparency Act, would, among other things, require a covered provider, as defined, to make available an artificial intelligence (AI) detection tool at no cost to the user that meets certain criteria

Authority

2/2

Level 2: Binding law enacted by the state legislature.

Senate Bill No. 942 CHAPTER 291 An act to add Chapter 25 (commencing with Section 22757) to Division 8 of the Business and Professions Code

Currency

—

computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)

Classification

Coverage topicAI transparency and provenance
PerspectiveRegulatory/legal
Lifecycle stage5 Deploy
Layermodel
Granularitytopic page