Back to assessments
Source assessmentCore

Assembly Bill No. 2013

Generative AI training data transparencyRegulatory/legaltopic page

Assessment outcome

total 4/4 (actionability 2 + authority 2); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 6.0/6

Total4/6
Actionability2/2
Authority2/2
Currency—

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

Authored by Irwin and issued as California legislative bill text.

Issuer authority (evidence)

Level 2: Binding law enacted by the California legislature.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

HTTP 200, 1197 words of full text extracted

G2 · AI nexuspass

The bill focuses directly on generative artificial intelligence and training data transparency.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

Establishes legal governance rules requiring developers to publish documentation regarding training data.

G4 · Attributablepass

Authored by Irwin and issued as California legislative bill text.

G5 · In forcepass

Passed by the legislature and approved by the governor with no repeal notice.

Scored criteria

Actionability

2/2

Level 2: Names a specific obligation and duty developers must follow regarding training data documentation.

the developer of the system or service shall post on the developer’s internet website documentation regarding the data used by the developer to train the generative artificial intelligence system or service

Authority

2/2

Level 2: Binding law enacted by the California legislature.

Assembly Bill No. 2013 CHAPTER 817 An act to add Title 15.2 (commencing with Section 3110) to Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code

Currency

—

computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)

Classification

Coverage topicGenerative AI training data transparency
PerspectiveRegulatory/legal
Lifecycle stage2 Collect & process data
Layermodel
Granularitytopic page