Source assessmentSupporting
Artificial Intelligence Technology Strategy (2017)
Artificial Intelligence Technology StrategyRegulatory/legal
Assessment outcome
total 3/6 (actionability 1 + authority 2 + currency 0)
Total3/6
Actionability1/2
Authority2/2
Currency0/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
This source has not been read into a full record yet; only the screening assessment is available.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
In the future, it is necessary for industry, academia, and government to make collective efforts towards developing an environment where information input/output devices such as sensors and so on can be installed
Authority
2/2No rationale recorded.
Based on instructions issued by the Prime Minister in “Public-Private Dialogue towards Investment for the Future” in April 2016, the national government 3 established the “Strategic Council for AI Technology”.
Currency
0/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicArtificial Intelligence Technology Strategy
PerspectiveRegulatory/legal
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded