CEIAI Governance Database
Back to assessments
Source assessmentSupporting

Artificial Intelligence ante portas: Legal & ethical reflections

legal and ethical reflections on AIRegulatory/legal

Assessment outcome

total 2/4 (actionability 0 + authority 2); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 3.0/6

Total2/6
Actionability0/2
Authority2/2
Currency—

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuer authority (evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

Passed in screening.

G2 · AI nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G4 · Attributablepass

Passed in screening.

G5 · In forcepass

Passed in screening.

Scored criteria

Actionability

0/2

No rationale recorded.

Authority

2/2

No rationale recorded.

Panel for the Future of Science and Technology (STOA) | European Parliament

Currency

—

No rationale recorded.

Classification

Coverage topiclegal and ethical reflections on AI
PerspectiveRegulatory/legal
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded