Artificial Intelligence and Robotics in Nursing: Ethics of Caring as a Guide to Dividing Tasks Between AI and Humans
Assessment outcome
total 2/4 (actionability 1 + authority 1); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 3.0/6
Authorship & scope
Named authors Felicia Stokes and Amitabha Palmer are clearly identified.
Level 1 (capped): the quote establishes a journal venue but does not establish the peer-review status required for Level 2.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
HTTP 200, 2298 words of full text extracted
The article focuses primarily on artificial intelligence and robotics in nursing care.
The article explicitly addresses ethical rules and guidelines for implementing AI.
Named authors Felicia Stokes and Amitabha Palmer are clearly identified.
No retraction, supersession, or withdrawal notice is present on the page.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2Level 1: Provides principles and direction on ethical implementation without establishing binding steps or obligations.
We conclude that for AI to be implemented ethically, it cannot transgress the core values of nursing, usurp aspects of caring that can only meaningfully be carried out by human beings, and it must support, open, or improve opportunities for nurses to provide the uniquely human aspects of care.
Authority
1/2Level 1 (capped): the quote establishes a journal venue but does not establish the peer-review status required for Level 2.
Nursing Philosophy Volume 21, Issue 4 e12306 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Artificial Intelligence and Robotics in Nursing: Ethics of Caring as a Guide to Dividing Tasks Between AI and Humans
Currency
—computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)