Back to assessments
Source assessmentSupporting

Artificial Intelligence Model Risk Management: Observations from a Thematic Review

AI model risk managementRegulatory/legal

Assessment outcome

total 2/4 (actionability 1 + authority 1); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 3.0/6

Total2/6
Actionability1/2
Authority1/2
Currency—

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuer authority (evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

Passed in screening.

G2 · AI nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G4 · Attributablepass

Passed in screening.

G5 · In forcepass

Passed in screening.

Scored criteria

Actionability

1/2

No rationale recorded.

MAS encourages all financial institutions to reference these good practices when developing and deploying AI

Authority

1/2

No rationale recorded.

Monetary Authority of Singapore Subscribe to Updates Get notified whenever news and updates

Currency

—

No rationale recorded.

Classification

Coverage topicAI model risk management
PerspectiveRegulatory/legal
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded