Analysis of the Performance of Different Accountability Strategies for Autonomous Robots
Assessment outcome
total 0/4 (actionability 0 + authority 0); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 0.0/6
Authorship & scope
The authors of the chapter are explicitly named.
Level 0: Authored by individual university researchers as a conference paper, not official regulation, standard, or explicitly stated peer-reviewed article.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
HTTP 200, 1327 words of full text extracted
The source focuses primarily on autonomous robots and algorithmic accountability strategies.
It directly addresses accountability and auditing mechanisms for robotic systems.
The authors of the chapter are explicitly named.
There is no indication on the page that this version is superseded or retracted.
Scored criteria
Actionability
0/2Level 0: The text only describes and analyzes a system design, providing no specific binding obligation, control, or procedural duty.
This work presents a generic approach to developing an accountability system that consists of four main components: a system event logger, a message producer, a distributed event streaming platform, and a database.
Authority
0/2Level 0: Authored by individual university researchers as a conference paper, not official regulation, standard, or explicitly stated peer-reviewed article.
Fernández-Becerra, L., Guerrero-Higueras, Á.M., Rodríguez-Lera, F.J., Fernández-Llamas, C. (2022). Analysis of the Performance of Different Accountability Strategies for Autonomous Robots.
Currency
—computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)