An Ethics Evaluation Tool for Automating Ethical Decision-Making in Robots and Self-Driving Cars
Assessment outcome
total 2/4 (actionability 1 + authority 1); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 3.0/6
Authorship & scope
Authored by Jason Millar from the Department of Philosophy, Carleton University.
Level 1 (capped): the quote establishes a journal venue but does not establish the peer-review status required for Level 2.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
HTTP 200, 11623 words of full text extracted
The paper focuses explicitly on automating ethical decision-making in robotics and artificial intelligence.
It addresses ethical evaluation, governance issues, and design principles for automated decision-making systems.
Authored by Jason Millar from the Department of Philosophy, Carleton University.
The source is an academic journal article without any retraction or supersession notice.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2Level 1: Provides general ethical direction and principles for designers without specifying concrete, binding implementation steps. [quote matched canonical, not verbatim]
When automating ethical decision-making, designers must not create technology that subjects users to morally problematic paternalism.
Authority
1/2Level 1 (capped): the quote establishes a journal venue but does not establish the peer-review status required for Level 2.
Applied Artificial Intelligence An International Journal ISSN: 0883-9514 (Print) 1087-6545 (Online) Journal homepage: www.tandfonline.com/journals/uaai20 An Ethics Evaluation Tool for Automating Ethical Decision-Making in Robots and Self-Driving Cars Jason Millar To cite this article: Jason Millar (2016) An Ethics Evaluation Tool for Automating Ethical Decision-Making in Robots and Self-Driving Cars, Applied Artificial Intelligence, 30:8, 787-809, DOI: 10.1080/08839514.2016.1229919
Currency
—computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)