Source assessmentSupporting
aims
AI legal systems and governanceRegulatory/legal
Assessment outcome
total 4/6 (actionability 0 + authority 2 + currency 2)
Total4/6
Actionability0/2
Authority2/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
0/2No rationale recorded.
In this report, in the lifecycle from data collection or model development to AI system development, (including AI models), and finally use of AI services, we will describe on the premise of three main actors; AI developer, AI provider and AI user.
Authority
2/2No rationale recorded.
Interim Report February 4, 2025 AI Strategic Council / AI Institutional Study Group
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicAI legal systems and governance
PerspectiveRegulatory/legal
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded