Source assessmentSupporting
AI in human resource management: The limits of empiricism
AI in human resource managementMultilateral
Assessment outcome
total 4/6 (actionability 0 + authority 2 + currency 2)
Total4/6
Actionability0/2
Authority2/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
0/2No rationale recorded.
This paper critically examines the use of AI in human resource management, showing how flawed objectives, biased data, and opaque programming undermine its effectiveness.
Authority
2/2No rationale recorded.
ILO is a specialized agency of the United Nations International Labour Organization
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicAI in human resource management
PerspectiveMultilateral
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layermodel
GranularityNot recorded