Back to assessments
Source assessmentSupporting

公共政策網路參與實施要點

generative AI use guidelinesRegulatory/legal

Assessment outcome

total 3/4 (actionability 2 + authority 1); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 4.5/6

Total3/6
Actionability2/2
Authority1/2
Currency—

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuer authority (evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

Passed in screening.

G2 · AI nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G4 · Attributablepass

Passed in screening.

G5 · In forcepass

Passed in screening.

Scored criteria

Actionability

2/2

No rationale recorded.

三、製作機密文書應由業務承辦人親自撰寫,禁止使用生成式 AI 。

Authority

1/2

No rationale recorded.

主(協)辦單位 國家科學及技術委員會

Currency

—

No rationale recorded.

Classification

Coverage topicgenerative AI use guidelines
PerspectiveRegulatory/legal
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded