Back to assessments
Source assessmentContext only

A Comprehensive Survey on Robo-Ethics

Robo-ethics and AI governanceAcademicdocument

Assessment outcome

total 1/4 (actionability 0 + authority 1); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 1.5/6

Total1/6
Actionability0/2
Authority1/2
Currency—

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

Authors are explicitly named at the end of the text.

Issuer authority (evidence)

Score 1: Level 1 because it is published by a reputable institution (Springer) as an academic book chapter, but peer review is not explicitly established in the text.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

HTTP 200, 1791 words of full text extracted

G2 · AI nexuspass

The source is a comprehensive survey entirely focused on artificial intelligence and robotics ethics.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

The text explicitly addresses ethical, legal, and social issues, safety, and regulatory aspects of AI robots.

G4 · Attributablepass

Authors are explicitly named at the end of the text.

G5 · In forcepass

The text is a published academic chapter with no indication of being superseded, withdrawn, or retracted.

Scored criteria

Actionability

0/2

Score 0: Level 0 because it provides analysis and description only without binding steps or principles.

This review paper’s goal is to look at the ethical, legal, and social complications of using AI robots.

Authority

1/2

Score 1: Level 1 because it is published by a reputable institution (Springer) as an academic book chapter, but peer review is not explicitly established in the text.

Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 1220. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-4650-7_9

Currency

—

computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)

Classification

Coverage topicRobo-ethics and AI governance
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
Granularitydocument