CEI AI Governance Database
Back to assessments
Row 191 · m191-arc-evalsSupporting

ARC Evals

Proposed Additional Source CategoriesCivil-society/NGOhub homepage

Assessment outcome

total 2/4 (actionability 1 + authority 1); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 3.0/6

Total2/6
Actionability1/2
Authority1/2
Currency

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

HTTP 200, 1271 words of full text extracted

G2 · AI nexuspass

AI systems and their capabilities and risks are the primary subject of the organization and page.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

The source addresses risk, safety, and policies relating to advanced AI systems.

G4 · Attributablepass

The organization METR is clearly named as the issuing body throughout the text and copyright notice.

G5 · In forcepass

There is no indication on the page that this current version of the site or its policies are superseded.

Scored criteria

Actionability

1/2

Level 1: Provides principles and direction regarding risk transparency questions, without naming specific binding obligations.

What should companies share about risks from frontier AI models? We describe areas for risk transparency and specific technical questions that a frontier AI developer could answer.

Authority

1/2

Level 1: Issued by a reputable civil-society research organization acting officially.

METR (pronounced 'meter') is a research nonprofit that scientifically measures whether and when AI systems might threaten catastrophic harm to society.

Currency

computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)

Classification

Coverage topicAI capabilities and catastrophic risk evaluation
PerspectiveCivil-society/NGO
Lifecycle stage4 Verify & validate
Layermodel
Trackgeneral
Granularityhub homepage

Review notes

Suggested action

landing page, not a citable document — consider the institution registry, or replace with the document itself

Pipeline flags

currency_no_date;partial_scores:currency