CEI AI Governance Database
Back to assessments
Row 190 · m190-apollo-researchSupporting

Apollo Research

Proposed Additional Source CategoriesIndustryhub homepage

Assessment outcome

total 3/6 (actionability 0 + authority 1 + currency 2)

Total3/6
Actionability0/2
Authority1/2
Currency2/2

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

HTTP 200, 814 words of full text extracted

G2 · AI nexuspass

The page focuses primarily on artificial intelligence, specifically frontier AI risks and safety research.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

The content explicitly discusses AI governance, regulatory frameworks, safety, and oversight.

G4 · Attributablepass

The issuing organization, Apollo Research, is clearly named throughout the site and registration details.

G5 · In forcepass

There is no positive evidence that the current version of the page or organization's mandate is superseded.

Scored criteria

Actionability

0/2

Score 0: Description or analysis only, containing no binding steps, specific obligations, or principles.

Authority

1/2

Score 1: Issued by a reputable private research organization acting officially as a Public Benefit Corporation. [quote matched fuzzy, not verbatim]

Apollo Research is spinning off from our fiscal sponsor into a Public Benefit Corporation (PBC).

Currency

2/2

computed: newest date 2026-08-16 (via http-header), ~0.0y old; within the 24-month ai_law_policy_news window for perspective 'Industry' → 2

Classification

Coverage topicfrontier AI safety and governance
PerspectiveIndustry
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layermodel
Trackgeneral
Granularityhub homepage

Review notes

Suggested action

landing page, not a citable document — consider the institution registry, or replace with the document itself

Pipeline flags

quote_fuzzy:authority