Stanford HAI
Assessment outcome
only 1 of 3 criteria could be scored (actionability 0) — below the 2 needed for a tier
Eligibility gates
HTTP 200, 1506 words of full text extracted
The source is entirely about human-centered artificial intelligence, research, and applications.
The text directly addresses AI governance, policy challenges, and regulatory responses.
The issuing body is clearly identified as the Stanford Institute for Human-Centered AI.
No indicators of supersession, withdrawal, or repeal are present on the page.
Scored criteria
Actionability
0/2Score 0: Description or analysis only, with no binding steps or principles.
Authority
—NO SCORE — quote not found on the page, so the score was dropped as ungrounded. Model quoted: “Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence” · stated reason: Score 1: Reputable academic institution acting officially.
Currency
—computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)
Classification
Review notes
landing page, not a citable document — consider the institution registry, or replace with the document itself
currency_no_date;partial_scores:authority;currency;quote_invalid:authority