Back to assessments
Source assessmentSupporting

Provisions on the Management of Algorithmic Recommendations in Internet Information Services

Asia-PacificRegulatory/legaltopic page

Assessment outcome

total 3/4 (actionability 2 + currency 1); authority unscored, so pro-rated to 4.5/6

Total3/6
Actionability2/2
Authority—
Currency1/2

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

Named translating and publishing organization provides clear attribution.

Issuer authority (evidence)

NO SCORE — quote not found on the page, so the score was dropped as ungrounded.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

HTTP 200, 4859 words of full text extracted

G2 · AI nexuspass

The text explicitly establishes provisions for algorithmic recommendation technology and services.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

The provisions govern algorithmic recommendation activities, regulatory oversight, and compliance.

G4 · Attributablepass

Named translating and publishing organization provides clear attribution.

G5 · In forcepass

No text indicates that these provisions have been superseded, repealed, or withdrawn.

Scored criteria

Actionability

2/2

Level 2: Names specific obligations and controls providers must follow. [quote matched fuzzy, not verbatim]

Algorithmic recommendation service providers shall implement primary responsibility for algorithm security, establish and complete management systems and technical measures

Authority

—

NO SCORE — quote not found on the page, so the score was dropped as ungrounded.

Currency

1/2

computed: newest date 2022-01-04 (via meta), ~4.6y old; past the 36-month standards_frameworks window for perspective 'Regulatory/legal' but within 72 months — plausibly still the reference → 1

Classification

Coverage topicalgorithmic recommendation provisions management
PerspectiveRegulatory/legal
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
Granularitytopic page