CEIAI Governance Database
Back to the database
Record STMT-WFFEA3EAspirational

Hacia una Estrategia de Inteligencia Artificial para Chile

HACIA UNA ESTRATEGIA DE INTELIGENCIA ARTIFICIAL PARA CHILE

Strategy State lawLatin America and the Caribbean · CLproposed

This document outlines the foundational framework and strategic justification for developing a national artificial intelligence strategy for Chile. It reviews international and domestic contexts, examines the impacts of AI on labor, ethics, data protection, and society, and proposes a 34-week project roadmap to build a comprehensive national AI strategy.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

Comisión Desafíos del Futuro, Ciencia, Tecnología e InnovaciónLegislature · CL
Lead issuer
Legal forceAspirational
Under whose authorityState law
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

National governmentLegislatorsRegulatorsCompaniesResearchers and academics

Policymakers, researchers, and national stakeholders should read this to understand the rationale and roadmap for establishing Chile's national AI strategy.

Sectors
Cross-sectorResearch and science

What the document contains

What's covered

The document covers the strategic justification for a national AI strategy by analyzing international trends (such as OECD principles and foreign national strategies), assessing Chile's current domestic capabilities in research, entrepreneurship, and education, and laying out a structural roadmap and timeline for creating Chile's national AI policy.

What's missing

It does not contain final binding legislation, immediate enforcement mechanisms, or definitive technical standards, as it is a proposal document detailing how to build a future strategy.

Key takeaways
  • Artificial intelligence represents a fundamental technological revolution that can significantly advance national priorities such as economic prosperity, education, and social equality.
  • Chile has strong foundational conditions, including a growing entrepreneurial culture and high-level universities, making it well-positioned to lead in AI within the region.
  • The development of AI brings critical challenges regarding workforce automation, ethical use, data privacy, and algorithmic bias that must be managed through a national pact.
  • Current AI initiatives and research in Chile are scarce and scattered, suffering from a lack of critical mass and heavy dependence on foreign software tools.
  • The document proposes a 34-week project divided into surveying, consolidation, strategy design, and dissemination phases to establish an official national AI strategy.
Principles it states
The AI strategy must focus on human and social development, ensuring that society benefits democratically and transversally.Systems of AI should operate robustly and securely, respecting the rule of law, human rights, and democratic values.Transparency, explainability, and accountability are required to prevent algorithmic bias and maintain public trust.
Outline
· 1. Resumen Ejecutivo
· 2. Justificación Estratégica
  - A. Introducción
  - B. Lo que están haciendo otros
  - C. Realidad nacional
  - D. ¿Por qué es necesaria una estrategia IA para Chile?
· 3. Proyecto de creación de una estrategia de Inteligencia Artificial para Chile
  - A. Objetivo General
  - B. Objetivos Específicos
  - C. Estructura del proyecto
  - D. Etapas del proyecto y propuestas específicas (34 semanas)
IssuedAugust 2019
Length6,993 words · 21 pages
FormatNot recorded
Scopenational

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Human Dignity

3/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

Esto implica la renuncia a ciertos derechos fundamentales que deben conocerse y consentirse. Una estrategia de IA permitirá establecer mecanismos y normativa para asegurarse que todos los aspectos éticos involucrados y que afecten a personas sean considerados.

Impacto humano y social de la implementación y uso de la IA

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Oversight

3/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

Los sistemas de IA deberían diseñarse de forma tal que respeten las reglas de la ley, derechos humanos, valores democráticos y diversidad, y deberían incluir salvaguardas apropiados – por ejemplo, habilitar la intervención humana cuando sea necesario

Lo que manifiesta la OCDE

screening score · 2026-10-23

Transparency

3/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

La adopción de una estrategia país de IA no puede operar bajo una lógica de “cajas negras”. Mientras más se extiende los dispositivos y servicios basado en IA, más aumenta los potenciales riesgo de que las tecnologías se vuelvan opacas e incomprensibles

Impacto humano y social de la implementación y uso de la IA

screening score · 2026-10-23

Enforcement

0/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

N/A

screening score · 2026-10-23

Topics

Physical AI Governancecontext
artificial_intelligence national_strategy research_and_development automation ethics