Back to the database
Record STMT-WF32089Aspirational

Ethical Decision-Making for Social Robots in Elderly Care Scenario: A Computational Approach

Report Institutional policyGlobalin force

This research paper presents a computational approach using supervised machine learning algorithms to address ethical considerations in robot-assisted fetching tasks for elderly care. It develops an ethical framework using a greet or beat approach, validated through a pilot study with thirty caregiving participants. The findings demonstrate the feasibility of automating ethical decision-making for social robots to promote the well-being and ethical treatment of older individuals.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

SpringerIndustry
Publisher
Legal forceAspirational
Under whose authorityInstitutional policy
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

Researchers and academicsGeneral publicAI developers and providersAI deployers and users

Researchers and developers in roboethics and assistive technology looking for computational approaches to ethical decision-making in elderly care.

Sectors
Healthcare · elderly careResearch and science · robotics and AI research

What the document contains

What's covered

The paper covers ethical considerations in robot-assisted tasks for elderly care, a computational framework using machine learning algorithms to evaluate fetching scenarios, and a pilot study assessing caregiver decision-making.

What's missing

The text does not provide binding regulatory requirements, legal enforcement mechanisms, or formal compliance standards.

Key takeaways
  • Integrating social robots in elderly care requires robust ethical decision-making frameworks.
  • A computational approach using supervised machine learning can effectively predict ethical choices in robot-assisted fetching tasks.
  • A pilot study with thirty experienced caregivers revealed diverse ethical perspectives on assistive care scenarios.
  • Automating ethical decision-making helps support responsible deployment and promotes the well-being of elderly individuals.
Issued3 December 2023
Length1,551 words
FormatNot recorded
Scopeglobal

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

0/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Fairness

0/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Dignity

3/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

ultimately promoting the well-being and ethical treatment of elderly individuals

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Oversight

0/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Privacy

0/5

Protection of personal data and private life

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Transparency

0/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Enforcement

0/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Impact Assessment

0/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Topics

roboethics social_robots elderly_care machine_learning human_robot_interaction